Scores & indices

HAS-BLED calculator

Nine factors that tell you what to fix — not whether to stop the anticoagulant.

FreeNo sign-upWorks offlineNo patient data stored
Use alongside CHA₂DS₂-VASc — it flags what to fix, not whether to anticoagulate.Reference: Pisters et al., Chest 2010.

How to read the result

HAS-BLED falls into these published bands.

< 3Low–moderate risk
≥ 3High bleeding risk
Worked example

A 72-year-old with a systolic blood pressure of 168 mmHg who takes a daily NSAID for osteoarthritis, reviewed before anticoagulation for AF.

HAS-BLED 3 — high bleeding risk (~3.7 major bleeds per 100 patient-years)

Review rather than withhold: control the blood pressure, replace the NSAID, and schedule closer follow-up — two of the three points are fixable.

Who this is for

For clinicians starting or reviewing oral anticoagulation, usually straight after CHA₂DS₂-VASc. HAS-BLED counts uncontrolled hypertension, renal and liver dysfunction, prior stroke, bleeding history, labile INR, age over 65, antiplatelets or NSAIDs, and alcohol — and its job is to surface the modifiable ones and set the review interval, not to veto treatment.

How it works

What it calculates

Major-bleeding risk on oral anticoagulation from nine factors — hypertension, renal and liver function, stroke, bleeding history, labile INR, age over 65, antiplatelets/NSAIDs, and alcohol.

How to use it

A score of 3 or more flags high bleeding risk. Its purpose is to surface the modifiable factors — control the blood pressure, stop the NSAID, stabilise the INR — and to schedule closer review, not to veto anticoagulation.

The pairing

Read it alongside CHA₂DS₂-VASc: in most patients with a clear stroke-prevention indication, the ischaemic risk of withholding exceeds the bleeding risk of treating. Reference: Pisters et al., Chest 2010.

Built on published evidence

  • Pisters et al., Chest 2010

Codification last reviewed 2026-08-28, and checked against published reference values in automated tests on every release — see the full evidence ledger.

Questions clinicians ask

Should a HAS-BLED of 3 or more stop anticoagulation?

Rarely. A score of 3 or more flags high bleeding risk, and the response is to correct the modifiable factors — blood pressure, INR stability, antiplatelets and NSAIDs, alcohol — and review more often. In most patients with a clear indication, the ischaemic risk of withholding exceeds the bleeding risk of treating.

What counts as hypertension in HAS-BLED?

Uncontrolled hypertension — a systolic blood pressure above 160 mmHg. A treated, controlled blood pressure does not score the point, which is exactly what makes it a modifiable factor worth chasing.

What does labile INR mean?

Time in therapeutic range below 60% on warfarin — unstable or frequently out-of-range INRs. It is a warfarin-specific criterion, and one of the factors an anticoagulation review can actually improve.

Where do the bleed rates come from?

Major-bleed rates per 100 patient-years from the Euro Heart Survey cohort (Pisters et al., Chest 2010). Scores of 6 and above had too few patients for a reliable estimate, so the tool does not quote a rate there.

Related calculators

One calculator is the door. The ward is the house.

Every result can land on a patient card. Paracelsus follows your whole ward — guided work-ups, trends, observation timers, and a one-tap handover — free, offline, with no patient data ever leaving your device.

Open Paracelsus

Information tool for healthcare professionals — not medical advice. Terms of use